
01883nas a2200241   4500008004100000022001400041245006400055210006400119260001200183300001000195490000700205520116900212653001601381653001801397653001501415653002301430653001901453653002801472653001101500100002001511700001701531856009301548       2018                        eng d  a0002-731600aSocial Networks and Northern Iroquoian Confederacy Dynamics0 aSocial Networks and Northern Iroquoian Confederacy Dynamics  c01/2018  a13-330 v833 a<p>The Wendat (Huron) and Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) confederacies of northeastern North America are often presented as functionally equivalent political formations despite their having distinct cultural traits and unique geopolitical and developmental histories. In this article we employ social network analysis of collar decoration on ceramic vessels both to examine organizational differences in the social network that composed each group and to evaluate women’s participation in political activities as potters who produced and transmitted social and political signals. The concept of social capital and the dimensions along which it varies are employed to understand variability in network statistics and topologies. Our results indicate that the Wendat confederacy formed a “complete” network characterized by bonding ties of social capital, whereas the Haudenosaunee confederacy was a “coalitional” network characterized by bridging ties. The results suggest that women’s signaling networks were integral to how each confederacy functioned and the norms of reciprocity, trust, and information-sharing that defined each political formation.</p>
10aconfederacy10aHaudenosaunee10aIroquoians10apottery decoration10asocial capital10aSocial network analysis10aWendat1 aBirch, Jennifer1 aHart, J., P.  uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731617000592/type/journal_article