01970nas a2200205   4500008004100000245005100041210004900092300001200141490000700153520141000160653002101570653001401591653001001605100002001615700001801635700002301653700002001676700001901696856004901715       2008                        eng d00aFish Movement Among Lakes: Are Lakes Isolated?0 aFish Movement Among Lakes Are Lakes Isolated  a577-5880 v153 a<p>The concept of a lake as an isolated unit is a central theme in research and management of freshwater systems. Support is based on direct observations of lake communities. Studies undertaken in the last several decades lend tacit support because the methods used in both research and management often do not question the underlying notion that lake communities are essentially isolated. In a study of fish assemblages in interconnected lakes, we noted movement of tagged fish among lakes. We also found that species introduced to one lake were later captured in neighboring lakes. We found that fish species in lake assemblages did not differ from those in inlet and outlet stream assemblages; although relative abundance varied, species richness and composition did not. This finding suggests that fish assemblages in lakes are not isolated. Rather, immigration and emigration from streams and other lakes occurs. Although few individuals migrated to new lakes, any movement can affect population structure (e.g., through recolonization, gene flow) and management goals (e.g., spread of disease). Consequently, we suggest that methods commonly used to assess fish assemblages in lakes and the concept of the lake as a management unit may need to be reconsidered. Rather than be treated as isolated populations, fishes in lake communities may be better treated as a watershed-wide metapopulation.</p>
10afish assemblages10aisolation10alakes1 aDaniels, R., A.1 aMorse, R., S.1 aSutherland, J., W.1 aBombard, R., T.1 aBoylen, C., W.  uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1656/1092-6194-15.4.577